<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "DTDs/tei-epidoc.dtd">
<TEI.2 id="TVII_346">
<teiHeader>
	<fileDesc>
		<titleStmt>
			<title> 
			Vindolanda writing tablet number
 346
			</title> 
			<author>
				A.K. Bowman and J.D. Thomas
			</author>
			<principal>
generated by create-descripta-xml.pl
 - J. R. Ratcliff
			</principal>
		</titleStmt>
		<editionStmt>
			<edition n="1">
				Digital edition: 1 
			</edition>
		</editionStmt>	
	
		<publicationStmt>
			<authority>
				Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents, University of Oxford				
			</authority>
			<date>
2002-12-02
			</date>	
		</publicationStmt>
		
		<sourceDesc>
			<bibl>
				Alan K. Bowman and J. David Thomas, The Vindolanda Writing Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II), British Museum Publications ( London), 1994
			</bibl>
		</sourceDesc>
	</fileDesc>
	<profileDesc>
		<langUsage>
			<language id="eng">English</language>
			<language id="grc">Ancient Greek</language>
			<language id="lat">Latin</language>
		</langUsage>
			<handList>
				<hand id="hand1" first="yes"/>
				<hand id="hand2" first="no"/> 	 
			</handList>
	</profileDesc>
		<revisionDesc>
			<change n="0">
				<date>
				</date>
				<respStmt>
				<name>
				</name>
				</respStmt>
				<item>
				</item>
			</change>
		</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
	 
 <text>
 	<body>
		<div type="description">
		</div>	
								
		<div type="edition" lang="lat">
			<ab n="text">
<pb n="i"/>
<br/> .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .
<lb id="line-1" n="1" /> <emph>traces</emph>
<lb id="line-2" n="2" /> r<unclear>a</unclear>m tibi paria udo<unclear>n</unclear>[um
<lb id="line-3" n="3" /> <unclear>t</unclear>. ab Sattua solearu<unclear>m</unclear> [
<lb id="line-4" n="4" /> duo &middot; et subligarioru<unclear>m</unclear> [
<lb id="line-5" n="5" /> duo solearum paria d<unclear>u</unclear>[o
<lb id="line-6" n="6" /> <emph>traces</emph>
<br/> .   .   .   .   .   .   .   . 
<pb n="ii"/>
<br/> .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .
<lb id="line-7" n="7" /> ]um <unclear>s</unclear>alu<unclear>t</unclear>a...[
<lb id="line-8" n="8" /> ]<unclear>n</unclear>dem Elpidem <unclear>Iu</unclear>[
<lb id="line-9" n="9" /> ].enum Tetr<unclear>i</unclear>cum et om<unclear>n</unclear>[es
<lb id="line-10" n="10" /> [c]ontibernales cum quibus
<lb id="line-11" n="11" /> [o]<unclear>p</unclear>to felicissimus uiuas <emph>uacat</emph> [
<br/> .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .
<pb n="Back"/>
<lb id="lineBack-12" n="12" />  <emph>traces</emph>
			</ab>
		
			<ab n="addenda">
				<app type="addenda" >
					<rdg wit="author">
					</rdg>
				</app>												
			</ab>
		</div>
	
		<div type="translation" lang="eng">
			<ab n="translation">
		
&#34;... I have sent (?) you ... pairs of socks from Sattua, two pairs of sandals and two pairs of underpants, two pairs of sandals ... Greet ...ndes, Elpis, Iu..., ...enus, Tetricus and all your messmates with whom I pray that you live in the greatest good fortune.&#34;
		
			</ab>
		</div>
	
		<div type="commentary" lang="eng">
			<ab n="lineNotes">
			
<note id="note1" n="2" type="line" anchored="yes">
 The obvious restoration is <emph>mise]r<unclear>a</unclear>m</emph> (so <emph>CEL</emph>).
</note>
<note id="note2" n="3" type="line" anchored="yes">
 At the start <emph>tri]/a</emph> (so <emph>CEL</emph>) is impossible. <emph>t</emph> is very good and <emph>i</emph> is quite promising for the next letter; this suggests <emph>uigin]/<unclear>ti</unclear></emph>, a large quantity but not all necessarily for the use of one person. We suggest that Sattua is best understood as a personal name and note the brand <emph>Sattuo</emph> on a leather patch (<emph>VRR</emph> II, 93 no.9.i). Fatua is attested as a personal name in Lusitania (<emph>LC</emph> 264) but we do not think <emph><unclear>F</unclear></emph><emph>attua</emph> a preferable reading. <emph>paria</emph> is no doubt to be supplied after the break.
</note>
<note id="note3" n="5" type="line" anchored="yes">
 The double mention of the item is no doubt due to the fact that the second pair of sandals came from someone else (so <emph>CEL</emph>).
</note>
<note id="note4" n="1" type="line" anchored="yes">
 <emph><unclear>s</unclear></emph><emph>alu<unclear>t</unclear>a<unclear>re</unclear> .[</emph>, <emph>ed. pr</emph>. We now think that <emph><unclear>s</unclear></emph><emph>alu<unclear>t</unclear>a <unclear>a</unclear> <unclear>me</unclear></emph> is a more plausible reading; the final trace is exiguous.
</note>
<note id="note5" n="2" type="line" anchored="yes">
 At the end <emph><unclear>Pu</unclear></emph><emph>[</emph> is also possible.
</note>
<note id="note6" n="3" type="line" anchored="yes">
 <emph>R]<unclear>h</unclear>enum</emph> (cf. <ref type="tabletNum">347</ref>.a.1) is a possible restoration. <br/><emph>Tetr<unclear>i</unclear>cum</emph>: despite <emph>CEL</emph> we prefer to retain the reading, against <emph>Tetr<unclear>e</unclear>cum</emph> (see our note <emph>ad loc</emph>. in <emph>Tab.Vindol</emph>.I).
</note>
<note id="note7" n="5" type="line" anchored="yes">
 The words <emph>litterarum uestigia</emph>, which appear at the foot of col.ii in <emph>CEL</emph>, should be at the foot of col.i. 
</note>
			</ab>
		</div>		
	</body>
</text>
</TEI.2>
