Three non-joining fragments of an account written across the grain. (a) has a tie-hole visible and is from the top of a diptych; it has parts of five lines. (b) is a small piece with remains of four lines. (c), which has two tie-holes, is clearly from the bottom; it has remains of (probably) eight lines, but is too abraded to be legible.
]r..no c[
]eb.r...[
traces
].oris in [
] (den.) i s(emissem) (assem i) [
. . . . .
. . . . . .
] (denari-) s(emissem) (assem i) [
traces
] (denarios) vi [
] (asses) iii.[
. . . . . .
tio could be read for no but ratio is impossible.
Perhaps no letter lost between b and r; F]ebruar[i- is therefore possible but is not an easy reading. Line 4: coris (cf. [154].7 and note) is not impossible but is not probable.
The as symbol also occurs in c.3; here it appears to be followed by a symbol unlike any other we have seen in the tablets (but there is no certainty that all the traces on the photograph are ink).